Nothing unites a group of people like a common cause against a shared enemy. Yet, why peope are divided on their views of AI?

Historically, humanity has often found unity in opposition, a shared “enemy” that galvanizes disparate groups toward a common purpose. From wars against tangible foes to ideological battles against poverty, disease, or oppression, people rally together when the lines between “us” and “them” are clearly drawn. Yet, AI, arguably one of the most transformative technologies of our time, divides us rather than unites us in our opinions. Why?

The answer lies in the complexity of AI’s role and our psychological, social, and moral relationship with it.

AI is a Mirror, Not an Enemy

A “shared enemy” is most effective when it exists outside the group—a tangible other. AI, however, is our creation, born of human ingenuity. It doesn’t fit the classic mold of an adversary because:

• It isn’t a sentient being with motives.
• It reflects our own values, biases, and aspirations.

AI challenges us to look inward. It forces us to ask uncomfortable questions about who we are, what we value, and how we define worth. This introspection divides us because people interpret these challenges through vastly different lenses based on their experiences, education, and philosophical leanings.

The Role of Fear: Displacement vs. Empowerment

A shared enemy typically represents a clear threat, something that unites people through fear. With AI, the fear is fragmented:

• Fear of Job Loss: Workers in automation-prone industries see AI as a threat to livelihoods.
• Fear of Loss of Control: Technologists and ethicists worry about rogue AI or misuse by corporations and governments.
• Fear of Irrelevance: Creatives and professionals wonder if AI can replicate the uniquely human qualities they once considered irreplaceable.

Yet, others view AI as a tool for empowerment, enhancing productivity, solving global challenges, and democratizing access to knowledge. This duality splits the narrative, making AI both the hero and the villain.

The Moral Ambiguity of AI

Enemies like war, disease, or injustice have clear ethical dimensions—they are unequivocally harmful. AI, on the other hand, is morally ambiguous:

• It can generate medical breakthroughs but also deepfakes.
• It can enhance creativity but also disrupt industries.
• It can democratize knowledge but exacerbate surveillance.

This ambiguity leads to polarized perspectives: some see AI as humanity’s savior, while others view it as Pandora’s box. Without moral clarity, it’s difficult to form a unified stance.

AI Exposes Societal Divides

The debate around AI mirrors deeper societal rifts:

• Economic Divide: Wealthier nations and individuals see AI as an opportunity, while poorer ones fear being left behind.
• Generational Divide: Younger generations, growing up with AI, tend to embrace it, while older ones often approach it with skepticism.
• Ideological Divide: Optimists see AI as a tool for progress; pessimists fear its potential for misuse.

These divides reflect broader inequalities and differing worldviews, making consensus on AI nearly impossible.

Philosophical Ambiguity: What Does It Mean to Be Human?

AI forces us to grapple with profound philosophical questions:

• Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics: Does AI challenge the virtues that define human excellence—reason, creativity, and moral judgment?
• Descartes’ Dualism: If AI can mimic thought, does it blur the line between mind and machine?
• Nietzsche’s Overcoming: Should we embrace AI as a step toward transcending our limitations, even if it disrupts traditional values?

These questions don’t have easy answers, and different philosophical schools offer conflicting perspectives, fueling division.

Read More at Why AI faces descrimination in the age of Tools.

The Lack of a Clear “Enemy Narrative”

AI’s complexity defies a simple “us vs. them” narrative. Unlike a war or a pandemic, AI is multifaceted—it’s simultaneously a tool, a collaborator, and a potential disruptor. Without a clear enemy to rally against, people focus on their specific fears or hopes, fragmenting public opinion.

Points to Ponder

• Is AI Truly Divisive, or Are We?
  • AI doesn’t have intentions—it merely amplifies existing human divides. Could it be that our disunity over AI reflects deeper fractures in our societies?
• Can We Unite Around Common AI Goals?
  • What if we framed AI as a shared opportunity rather than a threat? For example, could we unite around using AI to combat climate change, cure diseases, or improve education?
• Does Resistance to AI Reflect Resistance to Change?
  • Throughout history, people have resisted transformative technologies, from the printing press to electricity. Is the divide over AI just the latest iteration of humanity’s discomfort with the unknown?

AI as the Great Uniter—or Divider?

While AI currently divides us in our opinions about how it is going to affect us, it also holds the potential to unite. Like all transformative forces, its impact will depend on how we choose to frame it.

Will we see AI as a tool for solving shared problems or as a threat to individual interests?

One thing is clear: the story of AI will not be written by the technology itself but by how humanity chooses to respond. By shifting the narrative from fear to collaboration, we may yet find common cause—not against AI, but through it.

If you are navigating the AI world, Please feel free to get in touch